Just before I read reports
of his Christmas address to the Vatican Curia, I was wondering if Pope
Francis ever actually received the Christmas card and other letters I’ve sent
him. He doesn’t write…; he doesn’t call…;
he doesn’t visit… What’s a girl to
think?
However, now I think it’s possible he has received my mail because his “15
Ailments of the Curia” echo many concerns I’ve expressed in my missives. If you’ve not read his list, I encourage you
to do so.
As much as I appreciate Francis acknowledging and even chastising the
hierarchy for its arrogance, hubris, insensitivity, hypocrisy, insecurity,
self-absorption, fear and unhappiness resulting in over-bearing, domineering, control-freak,
career-climbing, self-promoting, money-grubbing, gossiping, suck-up, fashionista
hierarchy members who travel in cliques, his litany had a glaring omission: the
ailment of “sexism.” I don’t know why he
overlooked that ailment unless maybe it’s one that plagues him or one he does
not acknowledge. Regardless, without
addressing it, the other ailments will never be fully addressed.
I actually believe that tackling Pope Francis’ list of 15 without
correcting the ailment of sexism likely will just make a sick turn of the crank
grinding women down further within the church and society. I don’t know if that would be an intended or
unintended consequence but humble, sensitive, secure, confident and happy
sexists are still sexists. One might
argue that such sexists are even more destructive ones because their charm wins
people’s confidence enabling them to manipulate and abuse people more easily.
I think Francis would bristle at being labeled a sexist. I think he probably envisions himself a very
pro-female kind of guy what with him appointing
5 whole women to his 30 person International Theological Commission. That mentality is fairly common amongst people
of Francis’ and my parents’ generation.
They are so indoctrinated into promoting a gender ideology of females’
limitations and duties, that they often see their sexism as just a factual
manifestation of nature…”it’s just how things are…” And though some such folks believe themselves
to be rather equality-minded, their face-palm worthy sexist statements and actions
belie the gender ideology to which they are enslaved.
Historically, women and their anatomy have been frequently compared
to many fruits: peaches, apples, melons, cherries to name a few. These tend to be degrading sexual metaphors. However, some people from my father’s
generation actually think they’re paying a compliment when they admire a woman's “melons.” Lack
of appreciation for such “compliments” simply baffles these folks. Francis
calling women theologians “strawberries upon a cake” might fall into this genre
of sexism. It might not.
And while Francis might see magnanimity in him having 16% female
representation on his theological commission, I see it as woefully inadequate. Numerous qualified women theologians could bring
the commission to an equal 50/50 split right now, today, no waiting. Yet, my lack of appreciation for Francis’ “magnanimity”
might befuddle sexists in the crowd. My
mathematical competence that realizes 16% is markedly less than 50% somehow
gets confused with the word, "ingrate."
Perhaps rather than having sexually inappropriate undertones Francis
just meant he thinks male theologians provide the foundational substance (cake)
of theological thought and women theologians add superficial, yet palatable adornments
(strawberries) to that foundation making it more attractive to consume; I don’t
know. But, I would expect a non-sexist to
say something like this, “Women theologians are like male theologians; the
depth and breadth of their diverse experiences of God are intrinsic to the very
substance of theology.”
I discussed Francis’ “women theologians are like strawberries on a cake”
statement recently with my youngest daughter (in her 20s) while eating her strawberry
adorned birthday cake. She mused that since
strawberries atop a cake provide the only healthy nutritional part of it, maybe
Francis believes women theologians provide the healthiest theological contributions. If Francis’ few female
leadership appointees prove to do anything other than mirror or smear frosting
on 2,000 years’ of male theologians’ cake, I’ll agree with her.
However, Francis overlooked female theologians such as Elizabeth
Johnson who might actually act as a conduit for the “freshness, fantasy and
novelty” of the Holy Spirit that Francis says he greatly desires. He instead opted to appoint female
theologians that seem to parrot what the guys have already said. Francis, why are you so reluctant to letting the Spirit blow where it will when it comes to women?
By the way, Francis, a friendly warning here…When I acknowledge those
same ailments in your list of 15, I’m labeled a “clergy-hater” or “church-destroyer”,
so brace yourself... But don’t be
discouraged. When people feel threatened,
they often label and try to discredit the source of their threat. Sometimes they even try to accuse the
opposition of doing what they actually do.
It’s kind of like how the church hierarchy has peddled gender ideology
for about two thousand years but now people who call the church out for this
sexist practice get labeled by you as “demonic” peddlers of gender ideology.
Bottom line: whether or not Ray Burke wins Cardinal fashionista of the
century, whether or not George Pell, Sean O’Malley and Tim Dolan avoid headlines and talk shows, whether or not the hierarchy starts interacting more
frequently and directly with their flocks, it will not make your gender ideology
that artificially limits women’s abilities any more acceptable. Possession of a uterus does not magically or
biologically make women more qualified to wash clothes, bake cookies, change
diapers, make coffee, run photocopies or type documents. Nor does it make them less qualified to think
and lead. In a globally connected world
with instantaneous communication abilities as well as economic opportunities
for women, taking centuries to correct errors and imbalances that could be
corrected instantly just does not cut it.
Dear brother Francis, please be guided by the words of Michael Jackson…look at the man in the mirror and “if you wanna make the world a better place, take a look at yourself and then make that change.”
I appreciate you are doing this on many fronts but in the area of women,
it is far too little, far too slow and suffers setbacks by your intermittent
sexist statements.
I welcome the opportunity to share with you the "freshness, fantasy and novelty" of the Spirit that blows through me. Please feel free to visit when you're in the U.S. or give me a call anytime.
Excellent article. ! Agree. totally!
ReplyDeleteMy thought about the women theologians was that they indeed might have a different recipe and the whole cake would then be very different.
ReplyDeleteJoan Winter OP
I love your Article. Im Adrian that those in the hierarchy Who Opose Pope Francis may do him harm. One night he does not wake up harm. And There are many women scared men or very ultra orthodox. So if our Heavnly father will protect our pope. From them Who Opose him the Pope just might be able to do more he cannot show His hand. Just yet. Or they will crucify him. There are akredytacji those Who pray for His demise. Can you imagine that. God help us all. And Happy Christmas. I just hope that the furia will have this examine of Their consience and do the Right thing. After all we are supposed to. They are not exempt
ReplyDeleteI think the strawberries on the cake are the best part, the part that makes the cake worth eating. Let's not be stingy with those strawberries, Pope Francis, but cover the top and let them fall on the sides!
ReplyDeleteThis text was sent to me via an email by Pippa. She said I could post it as a comment.
ReplyDelete"Hear hear! He has been brave saying what he did, but you are right: no mention of sexism...Also the analogy of "let them eat cake" (reputedly Marie Antoinette about the hungry crowds asking for bread) keeps springing to mind. So, rather than strawberries decorating a cake, why can't we women and men,all be part of the bread...?
From your lips to God's ears! It seems that sexism is the sin that the institutional church just can't drop, and it goes back to accepting the Greco-Roman world's institutionalized misogyny.
ReplyDeleteI think there are two reasons that Francis didn’t mention sexism among the ailments of the Curia.
ReplyDeleteThe first is that sexism isn’t specifically a Curial fault: it pervades most of the hierarchy, and a substantial portion of the clergy as well.
The second is that Francis doesn’t recognise sexism as currently practised by the institutional church as being a fault; in fact he doesn’t recognise it as sexism at all.
As for his leaving you in the lurch, without writing, without a call, without a visit, – well, he may be a Pope but underneath it all he’s a man and, as Shakespeare said, “men were deceivers ever.”
nice post
ReplyDelete